An Occultation Timing Primer

Updated: 2002 October 29; limited update 2007 Oct. 8
This was requested in a message by Steve Gemeny; below
is my response, updated Oct. 10 and 29.  Another good beginners
article was written by Guy Nason and placed on the Web site of
the Toronto Centre of the Royal Astronomical Society of Canada.
__________________________

Since this was written, an important video timing device has become 
available; it is the Kiwi OSD (On Screen Display) GPS video time 
inserter, designed by Geoff Hitchcock, "Kiwi Geoff", in New Zealand 
and now manufactured by PFD Systems in Bethesda, MD.  Details about 
it are on the PFD Systems Web site here.
__________________________

Also, now available, giving much more detailed information about 
observing occultations of all kinds, for those who want more 
information than the summary information given here, is IOTA's 
online observing manual, "Chasing the Shadow:  The IOTA Occultation 
Observer's Manual" available for free download here. 
__________________________ 

Steve,

      You asked about a primer for occultations, so I'll
attempt to give one below.  Besides the main IOTA site,
http://www.lunar-occultations.com/iota ,
there is some more basic information in the observing/occultations
section of Sky and Telescope's Web site,
http://skyandtelescope.com
When you get into Sky and Telescope's site, in the upper left, 
click on "observing".  From that menu, click on "celestial 
objects", and in the list of those, click on "occultations".
The Sky and Telescope site is set up so that you have to go 
through this procedure; their subpages are not directly accessible.

Joe Sedlak commented that my write-up below is too advanced, 
especially for scouts and middle/high-school students, and
provided additional background information to help explain
asteroidal occultations, and timing them, here.

      Basically, make timings with whatever resources you 
have.  First, for time signals, it's most convenient to use a 
shortwave receiver that can pick up WWV time signals at 5.0 
and 10.0 megahertz.  For those who want WWV, Radio Shack sells 
a digital short-wave receiver for between $70 and $100, 
depending on sales; a digital-tuning radio is much preferred 
to an analog one since it's so much easier to quickly find the 
station.  Those who don't have short-wave receivers for WWV or 
CHU might get a WWVB-controlled alarm clock, such as item 63-
964 available for $30 from Radio Shack.  You can ensure 
accurate time by briefly removing the batteries an hour or so 
before the occultation; that will force the clock to reset 
using WWVB.  You should set the alarm to go off 2 or 3 minutes 
before the occultation; start your tape recorder (or camcorder 
used for audio recording before that to record the alarm for a 
few seconds, then your voiced calls of the occultation 
disappearance(s) and reappearance(s), and then set the alarm 
to go off again 1 or 2 minutes in the future, and keep the 
recording going to record it as well.  The audio alarm is 
accurate to 0.01 sec. or so, but the LCD display has a delay 
of about 0.1 second at room temperature, and much greater as 
the temperature approaches or drops below freezing.  So use the 
alarm for timing, not the display, which, however, is useful 
for keeping track of the time to the nearest second so that 
you know when to observe (this makes these clocks useful even 
if you have a short-wave receiver).  Similar radios are 
available using the German DCF77 transmissions from Germany.  
Another source for accurate time would be just a car radio, if 
in a given area, a coordinator will record a selected strong 
local AM or FM standard broadcast radio station along with WWV 
time signals.  This master tape can then be used to determine 
the times of syllables spoken in the selected standard 
broadcast that those with only a car (or transistor) radio 
record along with their event calls.  In the Washington, DC 
area, the strong AM station WTOP at 1500 kilohertz can be 
used.

      A few observers use stopwatches for timing, just 
starting the watch at the occultation and stopping it to a 
time signal.  But for an asteroid occultation, where there are 
two events to time, you need either two stopwatches, or one 
with a split arm, or digital method for two timings.  And the 
star might be a close double (as we know to be the case for ZC 
593 that will be occulted by 431 Nephele on Nov. 2/3), perhaps 
producing 4 events instead of 2.  So I do not recommend 
stopwatches for timing events in real time; they can be used 
to determine times from a recording of a visual observation. 

      It is better to make at least an audio recording during
the occultation, so that either WWV or WTOP can be recorded
along with the observer's calls of the occultation events.
Tape recorders are relatively inexpensive, selling for about
$25 at numerous stores.  These days, many tape recorders
use voice activation to save tape, only recording when there
is sound; that, of course, makes them useless for timing.  So
if someone buys a tape recorder for timing, be sure to get
one that either doesn't have voice activation, or that can
turn off that feature.  After the occultation, the recording
can be played back several times with a stopwatch (even the
stopwatch function available on most digital wrist watches)
to time from a WWV minute tone, or a distinct syllable in a
word in the WTOP broadcast, to the event call.  Also, when
you record the observation, you can give some estimate of
your reaction time, or at least say something like "I think
I was about a full second slow in calling out the event".

     These days, many families are more likely to have
camcorders than tape recorders.  A camcorder records audio
as well as video, so they can be used like tape recorders
to record a visual observation.  Those with large telescopes,
about 12 inches or larger, could even video record a 9th-mag.
occultation by pointing the camcorder into a low-power
eyepiece [for a star as bright as ZC 593 or pi Arietis that 
will be occultation by Nephele or Lindemannia (respectively) 
during November, even a 2-inch or 3-inch telescope should 
work].  If you do that, practice beforehand, first on the 
Moon, then on bright stars.  It's best to use manual focus 
rather than automatic focus; you can maintain the proper focus 
better if it is fixed.  Video recordings eliminate the 
reaction time uncertainties of visual observations and so are 
preferred for timing occultations, when they can be made to 
work.  But visual observations are better than no 
observations, since the shape of an asteroid, especially near 
the path edges, is best determined by observations from many 
locations. 

     The best observations are made with a small video camera
attached to the telescope, with its output, and audio from
a microphone, recorded with either a VCR, or a camcorder that
accepts input lines for recording in VCR mode (inexpensive
camcorders don't have that capability).
IOTA recommends the PC-164C camera, available for about $130
from http://www.supercircuits.com (to place orders quickly, 
call 1-800-335-9777).  That camera can see about
as well as you can with an eyepiece with most any telescope,
and in some cases even better; it is very sensitive, and for
a 9th-mag. star, it should be able to record it with a 3-inch
telescope or larger.  For this, you also need a C-mount to
eyepiece adaptor so the camera, which only weights a few
ounces and is about 2 inches long and 1.3 inches wide, can
be inserted into a standard 1.25" eyepiece holder; Adirondack
Video sells such an adaptor for about $35.  The PC-164C has
a BNC male for the video, so you need to get a female BNC to
female RCA adaptor from Radio Shack to connect to standard
video (RCA) wires.  You also need a video microphone;
tape recorder microphones are too weak (mismatched impedance)
to work with VCR's.  Supercircuits (above) sells a small
video microphone called the PA3 for about $13; if you order
one, you should also ask for a TAB adaptor, about $2 more, to
use it with the standard small 9-volt batteries.  Also
recommended for those with SCT's is a focal reducing lens
to obtain a wider field of view with the small camera chip;
best is the f/3.3 Meade focal reducer sold by FocusCamera
in New York for about $150 (and available from some other
sources of Meade products); also useful and less expensive
is an f/6.4 focal reducing lens available from Orion and
other sources.  For more on video, see the main IOTA Web
site, especially the item near the top by Richard Nugent,
and the items right after it that give some additional
information.  I will help answer questions from those
who start to get into this.

     Most important is being able to locate the star.
Print the detailed finder chart from the main IOTA Web
site and practice locating the star well before the
occultation, preferably some night before the event.
If your telescope doesn't have a good go-to capability,
then it should have a good finder scope, 50mm or larger
aperture, so that it can see 7.5 to 8th-mag. stars in
a 4 deg. or larger field of view.

     As you suggest, I'm copying this to others (Bcc:)
to help them get started for the Clarissa occultation,
too (and maybe the other good events later in the fall).

     David

At 08:57 AM 9/19/2002 -0400, you wrote:
>David,
>
>While I have not (as yet) participated in any occultation observations, I
>appreciate being copied on these and I hope you will keep me on your
>distribution list...
>
>I am particularly interested in this DC event, and will likely attempt it.
>
>I would ask that you pass along a primer, short course, or at least a short
>list of links that would be helpful to Newbies. (While the Basic Information
>on the IOTA site is helpful, it presupposes some familiarity and there is
>far too much for a newbie to distill.)
>
>I will probably attempt to involve a group of Boy Scouts in the event since
>I am the Astronomy Merit Badge councilor in the troop. Depending on
>specifics of the occultation, I may have several of them observing from
>different locations around Gaithersburg.
>
>Having a concise write-up of what to expect, how to observe, equipment
>needed, etc, would be of significant help.
>
>Such a primer might also be of interest to others on the list who may also
>be newbies and considering making an attempt for this event.
>
>Let me know.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Steve