The Best Occultation of a Star by Pluto ever Predicted for North America will occur Sun. March 18 am - Updated 2007 Mar. 16, 18h UT

Useful observations of the faint star in Sagittarius might be made with telescopes with apertures as small as 10 inches

Extensive station list with local circumstances, and CCD observing tips, added

1st Astro Meteo Weather Forecast

     The best occultation of a star by Pluto ever predicted for 
North America will occur between 10:40 and 11:00 UT Sunday morning, 
March 18, in northern and possibly central Mexico, the western and 
central U.S.A., & southwestern Canada.  Information from this 
occultation will help for studying the time history of Pluto's 
atmosphere (which is expected to freeze out and collapse sometime 
during the next several years as Pluto's distance from the Sun 
increases) and for planning observations by the New Horizons 
spacecraft that is enroute to the Pluto system.  Although this event 
is the best so far for North America, the star is comparable in 
brightness to Pluto, with mag. V = 14.9 and R = 14.1.  Since the 
motion is relatively slow, useful astrometric observations of the 
occultation might be made with telescopes of 10-inch aperture or 
greater, especially with integrating video cameras like the 
Stellacam II, and I think that the signal to noise ratio might be 
good enough to measure Pluto's atmosphere with telescopes of 16-inch 
aperture or greater with video (especially integrating) 
observations, where the integrations might be done over 4, 8, or 
even 16 frames.  Integrations can also be done with software after 
the fact, with probably a little less sensitivity (especially if the 
tracking is not perfect), but then you might not see the target in 
real time to be absolutely sure you have it (but that might be 
ensured with brighter stars in the field of view). 

     I think that it will be possible to make useful observations 
from where astronomical twilight is just beginning, in Manitoba, 
Minnesota, Iowa, Missouri, Arkansas, and Louisiana, and certainly 
west of there, where the sky will be dark; east of those places, the 
twilight may be too bright, although I think Wisconsin, Illinois, 
and Mississippi have a chance.  Low altitude will hamper 
observations in Washington State and southern British Columbia. 

The star is UCAC2 25823784 at J2000 RA 17h 55m 05.70s, Dec -16 deg. 
28' 34.4", in northwestern Sagittarius about 2.5 deg. north of M23 
and 0.7 deg. south-southwest of 6th-mag. SAO 160915 at J2000 RA 17h 
56m 19.1s, Dec. -15 deg. 48' 45". A central occultation would last 
about 6 minutes. 

Maps, detailed finder charts, observing tips, and much other 
information about this event are on Bruno Sicardy's Web site. 
Due to the great distance, there's still a fair amount of 
uncertainty in where the actual path will be, as can be seen from 
the different predictions portrayed on Sicardy's Web site, but at 
least the uncertainty is relatively small compared to Pluto's 
diameter so that observers throughout the "lower 48" USA and 
northern Mexico have a very high chance for an occultation.  But 
with the current information, the location of the central line can't 
be predicted well enough to guarantee a "central flash" that will 
occur at the center due to focusing by the atmosphere. Observations 
of the central flash will be especially valuable for studying 
Pluto's atmosphere, so as many observatories as possible are 
encouraged to try to record the event so that some of them might 
record the central flash, since the phenomenon will be strong only 
for about 100 km distance from the actual central line, which could 
be anywhere over a range of about 2000 km on the ground, anywhere 
from the north-central USA to northern Mexico, possibly as far south 
as the southernmost part of Baja California. Let us know 
your plans to try to observe this occultation (size and location of 
telescope that will be used, and recording method) to try to 
coordinate coverage of the event, to try to prevent duplication of 
fixed-site chords by mobile observers and maximize the chance for 
observations of the central flash. Now that Pluto and the star 
are close enough together, accurate astrometric observations with 
long focal-length telescopes may be possible (especially after the 
lunar phase decreases enough) to refine the prediction of the 
central line, but so far, this has not been done, as far as I know, 
and there are only a few days left.  Even if you don't observe the 
central flash, your observation will help to at least determine the 
accurate astrometric parameters of the occultation, which are needed 
to determine the Plutocentric latitudes of the recordings of the 
star's fluctuations in the atmosphere that can be made from major 
observatories, and your observation could capture some unique aspect 
of Pluto's atmosphere; we are interested in how the atmosphere 
varies with different latitudes around Pluto. 

I've only checked Accuweather predictions for Texas; it shows that 
there will be only scattered cirrus over most of the State, with 
slightly thicker cirrus only in the far south.  A more detailed 
forecast will become available about 16h UT on Friday March 16th 
with the first Canadian weather forecast for astronomy (used by 
Clear Sky Clock). 

STATION LIST

This is the 1st version of this list, made 2007 March 15 at 7h UT,
but now with several updates made up to 18h UT of March 16.  Several 
unconfirmed stations that will probably be clouded out have been 
removed from the annotated (short) list.

Here is an annotated (confirmed observers indicated) abbreviated 
version of a larger station list.  If your station is not in either 
of these lists, send an email message to me and to Derek Breit at 
breit_ideas@hotmail.com.  Dave Herald provided the Occult input file 
for this event several months ago.  I have modified it so that the 
central line is about halfway between the "Swiss" and "Brazilian" 
predictions with Pluto offset as described on Bruno Sicardy's Web 
site.  But as noted above, the actual location of the center of the 
occultation path (from which the central flash can be observed) is 
poorly known, since it is not certain that the Pluto ephemeris 
offset will be the same this month as it was for the previous event 
and Sicardy believes that the error could be 1000 km or even a 
little more in the sky-plane (and then twice as much on the ground).  
There's only a small chance that we might get some recent 
astrometry, now that the two objects are in the same CCD field for 
long-focal-length astrometric telescopes, to improve the prediction.  
So for now, the central line defined by my prediction should be 
considered only as a reference line from which different 
observatories can be compared. 

The list is useful since you can use it to tell the predicted time 
of closest approach of Pluto's center to the star.  Note that for 
all observers, the event will occur late during 10h UT, which is 5 
am CDT, 4 am MDT, and 3 am PDT (= MST for Arizona).  

In the annotated (shorter) list, I've marked stations in the space 
between the distance (from my reference predicted central line, in 
km) and the observer's (or location's) name with "A" for a major 
observatory where observations are planned and that should be able 
to determine rather detailed information about Pluto's atmosphere 
from the observations; * for observations with smaller telescopes 
that should at least be able to tell if the central flash occurred 
or not, and help determine astrometric parameters of the 
occultation; and m for like *, but observer is mobile.  A ? 
indicates no confirmation, but it would be useful if someone could 
observe there.  "W" is a confirmed major observatory that will 
probably be clouded out, according to the current Astro Meteo 
weather forecast (see below), and "w" denotes other confirmed 
observers (* or m) who will likely be clouded out.  A blank (no 
mark) is a station where no observation will probably be made, but 
if someone does plan to observe there, please let me know; I'll 
remove most of them in future updates.  Let me know if you plan to 
observe; I'll post updated versions of this here until tomorrow 
(Friday) March 16 up to about 23h UT.  After that, I will not be 
able to update this Web site, but will be able to update the list 
for e-mail distribution up to Saturday morning at 14h UT, and Derek 
Breit can post that on his Web site (which will then 
supersede this one).  The predicted central occultation by Pluto's 
surface is 333 seconds, but the Pluto atmospheric variations will 
extend this at least to 400 seconds, and it is recommended that 
observers record at least for a 16-minute period centered on the 
predicted closest approach time (that is, from 8 min. before it to 8 
min. after).  Besides the UT of closest approach, the altitudes of 
the Star and of the Sun at that time are also given.  

WEATHER FORECAST

The first Canadian weather forecast for astronomy (Astro Meteo) is 
now available for this event; I've put the 47h prognosis forecast 
maps in this Power Point file.  They show that it will be cloudy 
across southwestern Canada and over most of the US Pacific 
Northwest, and also very cloudy over North Dakota, Minnesota, 
Wisconsin, Iowa, Tennessee, Kentucky, and most of Illinois, 
Arkansas, Louisiana, and New Mexico, and cloudy in eastern Nebraska, 
parts of Missouri (Kansas City is near the edge of a clear area 
extending south & west), and there will be marine clouds in most of 
the populous coastal areas of California (over the L.A. basin and 
west of the coastal mountains).  It shows clouds over the mountains 
of western Texas that could threaten McDonald Obs., and a patch of 
clouds over central Texas, from San Antonio to Tyler and extending 
south some distance from San Antonio; scattered clouds are predicted 
for much of western and southern Texas.  Perhaps more disturbing for 
Texas is the high humidity forecast for most areas east of Big Bend; 
with that, the usual adiabatic cooling clouds from the Gulf could be 
worse than Astro Meteo forecasts.  Accuweather is forecasting clear 
skies in most of these areas early in the morning, but with a 60% 
to 80% chance of it clouding up at all central and southern Texas 
locations an hour or two before the Pluto occultation.  Accuweather 
forecasts good conditions for eastern and central (mountains) Baja 
California.  Before going to Texas, I'll check with the next Astro 
Meteo forecast that will become available at about 4h UT March 17, 
and will check Accuweather and the National Weather Service 
forecaster to see how bad the situation might be there; I'll decide 
whether to try the event in Texas, or possibly switch to southern 
Baja California, then, but probably will not be able to update this 
Web site.  Check Derek Breit's Web site for later news.  Also, click 
here for the later Astro Meteo forecasts; the 35h prognosis maps 
will become available about 4h UT March 17, 23h maps at 16h UT March 
17, and the last 11h maps at 4h UT March 18, about 7h before the 
event (by then, also consult IR weather satellite images such as 
those available at http://www.rap.ucar.edu/weather/satellite but if 
the weather satellite is in eclipse, there will be a few-hour gap in 
its coverage that could occur when we most want it).  The 47h 
prognosis Astro Meteo maps are also in the following .gif files:  
Eastern cloud cover, Western cloud cover, transparency, 
surface humidity, and surface winds.

CCD Observing Tips

John Broughton observed a similar occultation by Pluto with a 
relatively small telescope at his home in Australia about a year 
ago; he offers the following advice for CCD observers:

Intrepid observers keen on recording this event will be looking at 
their observing options. High star density in that region and 
prediction uncertainty categorically rules out the option of CCD 
drift-scan. However, valuable data can be obtained by way of CCD 
photometry. 

I observed last June's 15th magnitude occultation from near the 
northern limit and was able to time a 68-second duration between the 
half-light immersion and emmersion. 1-second accuracy was achieved 
from 15-second exposures due to the quality of the data - noise 
levels were approximately 15 times smaller than the magnitude drop. 
My results are here.

It was only after the event I thought of a practical way to increase 
the frame-rate and at the same time obtain an appropriate 2 arc-
second pixel scale; a combination of 8x8 binning and eyepiece 
projection. Two weeks later, a 14th magnitude Leukothea occultation 
was observed by that method.  My results for that event are here.

Clear skies and may the path be with you!
__________________________________________ 

David Dunham, 2007 Mar. 16, 18h UT
Phones home 301-474-4722; office 240-228-5609; cell 301-526-5590 
e-mail david.dunham@jhuapl.edu
home e-mail:  dunham@starpower.net .