First results for the Jan. 10/11 Bathilde occultation

Updated: 2003 Jan. 14
     I videorecorded a miss at 3 km north of Preston's central line, 
south of Glennville, Georgia, and many other miss observations 
farther north have also been reported.  Steven Meeks says 
Jacksonville observers set up two stations, at 8 km and 20 km south, 
near US 17 in Georgia, and they reported misses.  But the 20 km s. 
disagrees with a positive observation by Peter Lazar at 13 km south 
near Baton Rouge, Louisiana; maybe the observer at 20 south was on 
the wrong star?  Houston was mostly clouded out, but Paul Maley 
reports that with the large telescope at George Observatory at 60 km 
s., they saw a 2-second occultation.  Peter Lazar was pretty sure of 
his event, and it did occur at about the right time, but 5 minute 
later, the star was lost in thicker clouds, so he is not 100% 
confident in it.  But it does agree with a short event at George 
Obs., and I think also with observations from two stations by Roger 
Venable (a remote video at 44 km S and a visual binoculars 
observation at 51 km S; the latter had a longer duration).  
Unfortunately, it clouded over in most of Italy (as expected), and 
also in much of southwestern France (not expected).  But supporting 
the Jacksonville observations and casting doubt on Lazar's are miss 
observations reported by the Spanish observers from Sabadell who 
travelled to locations near Narbonne, France, even south of 20 km 
S., and a positive observation by Oscar Canales I believe from his 
home in Pinsoro, Spain, at 94 km south, indicating that the south 
shift was well over a path-width (but according to Jean Lechaceux, 
Oscar was almost coincident with Roger Venable's chord, so he may 
have moved to near the s. limit for the occultation).  In the next 
few days, I'll check the reports more carefully and post the latest 
results here when I can. 

     The rather large shift for this bright star was disappointing, 
but in retro-respect could be expected because it was a rather 
bright Tycho-2 star, without the benefit of good proper motions 
determined for HIP stars.  The star was too bright to have good 
positions determined from any of the photographic surveys (AGK, 
Yale, or the recent UCAC), but too faint to be included in the FK 
catalogs.  Tycho-2 depended on old catalog positions for proper 
motions, and for SAO 117679, that could mean the notoriously poor 
Albany General Catalog from around 1900.  In the future, I will be 
less enthusiastic about occultations of Tycho-2 stars brighter than 
9th mag.  We do much better with HIP stars, and the 9th-mag. and 
fainter stars, especially for the latter when we have UCAC updates. 

     Our long trip to Georgia was not entirely without results.  The 
next evening, on the way home, we stopped east of Autryville, North 
Carolina, and from three separate stations we video recorded a 
grazing occultation of 7.6-mag. ZC 350 well on the dark side of the 
gibbous Moon, from 7:21 - 7:26 pm EST.  Bob Melvin informed me of 
some history of Autryville, and an unusual incident that occurred 
the morning of the day we were there, here. 

David Dunham, IOTA