Rare Occultation of Regulus by (166) Rhodope Timed in S. Europe on Oct. 19
Rhodope was found to be about 60 km in diameter rather than the predicted 35 km
The path predictions were quite accurate, within 0.2 sigma
Positive observations were made from two sites in Portugal, five sites in Spain, and one each in Italy and Greece
Updated: 2005 November 28On Wednesday morning, October 19th, the asteroid (166) Rhodope occulted the star Regulus, the brightest star in the constellation Leo (the Lion) for up to two seconds in a path crossing southern Portugal, southern Spain, southern Italy, and Greece. Several observers were clouded or fogged out in southern Italy, and in south-central and southeastern Spain; the weather was best in Portugal and Greece. Observers travelled from Germany and the USA to observe the occultation. You can read about the predictions for this outstanding occultation, and an ambitious effort to publicize the occultation and to try to involve many others to observe the event, as well as information about the unusual star, here.
My report of the occultation, and preliminary information about the analysis of all the observations, is below. The latest compilation of all of the observations are on the Euraster Web site. _________________________________ From: PLANOCCULT-owner@AULA.COM on behalf of David Dunham [dunham@starpower.net] Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 12:10 PM To: planoccult@aula.com; IOTAoccultations@egroups.com Subject: [PLANOCCULT] Regulus/Rhodope positive s. of Monesterio, Spain I ran a remote station with a 50mm telephoto lens and old image intensifier at a location a few km south of Monesterio, Badajoz province, Spain, at GPS coordinates long. 6 deg. 14.4045' W., lat. 38 deg. 03.3429' N., h 610m as determined by my McAfee GPS time inserter, but did not realize until after we returned to Arturo Montesinos' place and played the tape that it actually recorded an approximately half-second occultation at 4:23:50 UT (will get more accurate times later; the events were gradual, and I don't think Regulus' image was saturated - with the moonlight, 4th-mag. stars were the faintest that seemed to be recorded). I was able to start that system running 20 minutes before the occultation, just after starting it, I drove another 11 km farther south relative to the path, stopping about 7 minutes before the occultation, giving me enough time to put a camcorder on a small tripod on top of my rental car and record Regulus. No occultation occurred at that location, as far as I can tell; that was north of the town of Santa Olala Del Cala, just across the border in Andalusia province, Spain, at GPS long. 6 deg. 13' 45.4" W., lat. 37 deg. 56' 55.2" N., h 1600 feet. I was a little dejected after seeing the miss at my station, but of course now elated that the remote station recorded a positive event. According to Arturo's calculations, the remote site was 19 km s. of Steve Preston's central line and 31 km s. of Jan Manek's center. So the true s. limit must have been a few km s. of Steve Preston's s. limit (which was also at 19 km s.) - congratulations, Steve, your time was also good (predicted 4h 23.8m UT). Arturo Montesino and his wife also tried to observe the occultation, video recording it with my other digital tape camcorder and a less sensitive digital camera of his own, but the star did not disappear at their location about 40 km north of Preston's central line near Retamal de Llerena, Badajoz, Spain, at GPS location long. 5 deg. 50' 20.16" W., lat. 38 deg. 34' 27.23" N., h 509m. We purposely set up at locations a little outside of Jan Manek's limits, thinking that observers in s. Italy and elsewhere in Spain and Portugal would cover his path, especially near the center; we just wanted to increase chances that someone would have an occultation with the 1-sigma uncertainty greater than a path-width. We wanted to set up two more remote stations, one being my camcorder that Arturo used and a 5-inch SCT. We set up the 5-inch SCT and started to locate an appropriate star field, but didn't succeed in pointing it before a large band of clouds moved over the field, with motion showing that it would stay cloudy in the critical area awhile; that was less than 3 hours before the event. So we gave up on that, and not being sure that Arturo's camcorder could record the star well enough and wanting to get an observation to the north in case there was a north shift of the path, I also gave up the idea of using the 2nd camcorder as a remote station and instead gave it to Arturo so he could move to avoid the clouds, which he succeeded in doing. So rather than trying to run 5 stations according to our original plan near the A66 highway between Merida and Sevilla, we ended up with 3 useful video observations in that area of southwestern Spain. The forecast was for clear skies there, and it was mostly clear during our long drive from Madrid, but it was partly cloudy while we were in the occultation path (fortunately in the clear at the right time) and became mostly cloudy not long after the occultation. Farther east, observers who had planned to try to observe from the Valencia area mostly travelled west, setting up, along with other observers from Madrid, near the A4 highway some 200 km s. of Madrid. It remained very cloudy along the southeast coast of Spain, and was foggy in the path where it crossed A4, preventing most video observers from recording the star. Eberhard Bredner telephoned saying that Otto Farago probably was able to video record the occultation with his system, but would have to check his tape for that later. There are about 4 other positive reports from Spain and one from Greece on the Planoccult list. It looks like we will have good results from this rare bright event after all; we look forward to details of other observations (some already provided on Planoccult). It makes my trans-Atlantic flight, and over 800 km round-trip drive from the Madrid area, worthwhile. David _________________________________ Details of my remote successful observation: 2005 October 19, occultation of Regulus by (166) Rhodope, south of Monesterio, Spain, WGS84 long. 06 deg. 14.4051' W., lat. +38 deg. 03.3429', h 605m, 50mm telephoto lens & old image intensifier: U.T. 3:54:00 Started recording Regulus 4:23:50.21 Start of disappearance 4:23:50.25 - 50.30 Star stayed near 50% level 4:23:50.33 - 50.40 Star 4th mag. 4:23:50.41 Star 5th mag. 4:23:50.43 Star at noise level, maybe gone, end disappearance 4:23:51.06 Start of reappearance, barely visible in noise 4:23:51.09 Star 6th mag. 4:23:51.13 Star 4th mag. 4:23:51.16 Star 3rd mag. 4:23:51.18 - 51.25 Star stayed near 50% level 4:23:51.36 End reappearance, star at full brilliance 4:49:18 Stopped recording Regulus _________________________________ The European Asteroidal Occultation Network attempted a preliminary reduction of the Regulus occultation by (166) Rhodope on 2005 10 19 . Using the three observations where the observers DID RECORD the penumbra that really existed around the shadow, one finds an ellipse as shown below. The other reports are discrepant. Any observer should try to recover the gradual ingress and egress, and try to find the 0.75 mag drop levels, of which the timing gives the exact edges of the (166) limb. We are sure that this work is in progress (at least for Anthony, David and Rui - in alpha order !). Of course, the David Dunham observation is very important, since he was the "shepherd". Then fitting the other reports (sometimes as much as 2.55 seconds), one finds an ellipse 45.9+/-0.5km (width) by 63.4+/-0.4km (length). All this is preliminary, since the study of recordings is everywhere in progress. For EAON : Raymond DUSSER Gilles REGHEERE Jean SCHWAENEN _________________________________ From: PLANOCCULT-owner@AULA.COM on behalf of rdapt@tele2.fr Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 11:20 AM To: planoccult Subject: Fw: [PLANOCCULT] Shadow basics for Rhodopists Bruno Sicardy asked me to planoccult this mail, since he is not a subscriber. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bruno SICARDY"To: Cc: "planoccult" Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 12:34 PM Subject: Re: [PLANOCCULT] Shadow basics for Rhodopists Hello Raymond, yes, you are absolutely right, Regulus has really a strange shape! I put McAlister's paper on Regulus interferometric measurements, together with other papers on stellar angular sizes, on my web site. Concerning Regulus, I don't know about the various Rhodope occn recordings, but it would be great if some information on Regulus' size could be derived from this exceptional event... Cheers, Bruno _________________________________ David Dunham, President, International Occultation Timing Association (IOTA) e-mail: home, dunham@starpower.net office david.dunham@jhuapl.edu telephone: home, +1-301-474-4722, office +1-240-228-5609 cell phone +1-562-430-2391 (sorry, not international)